Hi, 5 JULY, 2010
I have been researching Bigfoot here in Texas and neighboring Arkansas and Oklahoma. I have found very similar evidence such as nesting sites, hair, scat samples, and footprints. I have also photographed and analyzed cast of footprints and even hand prints. (in Oklahoma I found a nest built into the resulting cavity and overhanging roots from an overturned tree, much like the one pictured on your site.)
I have been in contact with a professional biologist at the Max Planc Institute for Primate studies in Berlin, Germany and she is very interested in some of my research. She was instrumental in scientifically classifying the recently discovered "Giant Chimpanzees" (gorilla-sized) in the Congo. Her work involved extracting DNA from scat samples, which is probably the best source of genetic material outside of a captured specimen. She believes that Sasquatch DNA, if preserved and scientifically sequenced would be invaluable to the research and possible preservation of the species.
I asked the biologist for some methods for preserving Bigfoot/Sasquatch scat, which I previously found but could not adequately keep. I thought I would share the information that she sent me with you. There are two methods, one simple and inexpensive, the other more involved and slightly more expensive materials. I feel that it would be beneficial for any serious researcher to have at least the first set of materials available for an expedition.
(Consider also that one day the DNA may have a high monetary value as well)
The first method is as follows:
Purchase some Denatured Alcohol , which you can get at just about any hardware store. Denatured Alcohol is about 95% ethyalcoholol, with a few additives. Then get a glass jar big enough for a cross-section of the scat- a canning jar is probably about the right size and will give you a good seal. A well-washed-out mayonnaise or peanut butter jar will work as well. Make sure you wear gloves. Use woodetongueue-depressors, which you can get at drugstores to pick up the samples. (They are sterile and DNA-free) Otherwise, a pair of sticks will do, just dip them into the alcohol first.
Then put the scat sample in the jar and then slowly pour in the alcohol till it is covered. If it floats up a littlethat'sts OK. Then cover the jar and let it set overnight. The next morning pour out about half thalcoholol and then secure the lid back on tightly.
This will preserve the contents indefinitely, although the DNA will slowly degrade. I would recommend keeping a few filled jars like this for any samples: nails, tissues, hair, etc.
This is the second method that they used in Africa and had good results. This is a two-step process, not difficult IF you can get the materials.
The materials are usually stocked in medical supply houses and scientific equipment suppliers-. I don't know if you have access to them in your area. Another option is to order them on-line- I will include some links below. They tend to be a bit expensive.
You need two tubes or vials for each specimen. Biologists often use 50mcentrifugege tubes which are about 1 1/4 inch in diameter and are 4 or 5 inches long. They come with caps
You need 9ethanolanol (ethyl alcohol). (The other 5% is water.) You can sometimes get this at big drugstores. It is often called Pharmacy-grade ethanol. (Denatured alcohol also works but not as well) The other thing you need is Silica Gel beads or grains. Sometimes they have it in chain stores like Super Walmarts. Silica is used to absorb moisture in food products.
Wooden tongue-depressors are recommended to cut and handle the scat- they are disposable and sterile. You will also need a piece of kleenex or paper towel
Here is the two-step process:
Step 1:
First fill one of the tubes about three-fifths (30ml) with the ethanol.
Next, add a ball of scat about 1-inch in diameter.
Cap the tube and let it set overnight.
Step 2:
The next day, fill the other, empty tube with silica gel, about 4/5ths full.
Put a piece of paper towel the width of the tube, on top of the gel inside the tube.
Then loosen the cap of the filled tube to a small crack, enough to slowly pour off the ethanol, on to the ground. If you lose a bit of dissolved scat that is OK.
Put the ball of scat on top of the paper inside the tube that has the silica gel. Cap the tube and store it in an upright position. That's it, you're done.
The silica absorbes fluids and moisture, leaving a fairly dry and well-preserved specimen. Of course, the fresher the scat, the more likely it is that DNA can be recovered.
As promised, here are the links where materials can be purchased online:
If the long link above doesn't work you can search for the products on Fisher Scientific Supply's site:
Wishing you sucess in all your endeavors,
David A. Claerr
Thank you very much for sharing the information. I have found scat previously, but had no way to preserve it. I will add some of these items to my CSI kit and hope I find some more scat soon. However, I did run across a tree that had been marked it was still dripping with urine. Is there anything we can do with that?
Mitch
About the urine samples:
I would suggest having fresh, unused Xacto knives/blades and medical tweezers in your kit. Cut off the bark in thin slices and put it in an ethanol-filled container. Also catch any drips directly in the container as well, if possible. If you can get sterile cotton or q-tips you can swab the urine and place the cotton in the container as well. When the samples are analyzed, the materials are separated in a centrifuge, and also chemically, so there is a high probability that DNA can be extracted from the samples this way.
David A. Claerr

Mitch:
I was looking over some of your gallery pictures, and also saw a video of the vertebra and a rib that you found. Attached is an anatomical drawing that shows a portion of the human ribcage and spine.
The two short, nearly straight 11th and 12th ribs are similar to (though smaller than) the rib you found. The two spinal vetebrae are also similar in structure to the human lumbar vertebrae; the first lumbar is pictured.
The main differences that I can see from the photos and video are the size (obviously much larger than a human's) and the more prominent features of the bones, such as higher ridges where muscles and ligaments attach, and the bone ends on the rib where it attaches to the vertebrae. This more robust bone developement can also be seen in humans, such as bodybuilders who started training at a young age or in distinct populations like the Samoan Islanders.
There may be other differences in configuration, but generally speaking I think that the skeletal structure of a Bigfoot/Saquatch is more similar to the human than any other creature. I would suggest trying to locate more bones if possible, though I know you have already made additional searches.
One thing I am wondering about is whether there may be bigfoot burial grounds in select areas. I think I may have found an area here in Texas that has some indicators although I have not found any bones, based on the disturbed soil and slight mounds, deep in secluded ravines. It would be interesting to survey the area with ground-penetrating radar.
I hope this info is helpful in some way.
David
Here a a couple of my bones--Mitch
Thank you David. Your assessment is very interesting, and I can tell your response is well researched and thoughtout. I am amazed at how the pictured rib cage an vetebra resemble those which I have found. Would you mind if I share your remarks and photos with other Bigfoot researchers?
I have had many who have inspected the bones via video and photos, and they have come up with everything from a draft horse, to a coyote. This to me indicates they do not have a clear concept of just how large these bone are. And, why are there so many piles of bones of different animals (minus the skulls) along that particular ridge? It is almost as if someone is setting a territorial boundry--A taboo line telling all not not cross. If these are sasquatch bones, does that mean a rival sasquatch clan will kill a sasquatch intruder? It really bugs me that all the heads are gone. What do they do with them? Would my head join them if I got caught alone in their territory? This is one reason I have not penetrated the outter boundry. I don't think I want to push that limit yet.
I suppose the next thing to do is have them DNA tested. I have been looking for a Lab to do this, but when I mention speicies identification, they drop me like a hot rock. I suppose I could go to Tom Biscardi's group and have him test them. But I am reluctant to share something of this magnitude with any large/ professional Bigfoot group without assurances my research area would not be flooded with their members.
Anyway, thank you for your comments. Let me know If I can share them.
Mitch
Mitch:
Feel free to share my observations about the bones with other researchers.
I unsderstand your reluctance to go further into the area- I had a somewhat similar experience in Arkansas last year. To make a long story short, I had a bigfoot keeping pace alongside me as I walked along a trail. He was uphill, and sometimes lagged behind or got up ahead of me a bit. As it was dusk, I decided to take a longer route back along a logging road that had less brush and more visibility all around. At a certain place where the woods thickened again, a boulder about the size of a basketball crashed through the trees and thumped down on the trail about ten feet in front of me. Although I was alarmed, curiosiity overcame trepidaton, and I cut back toward the direction the boulder came from. Inside the brush was a clearing; a meadow with tall trees and fine grass. At the edge was a triangle formed by two large white rocks of different types and a skull that in every aspect resembled a wolf. I flelt that this was a symbol or marker of some kind. I removed the skull and left in a big hurry since there were more rustling noises. (Later I returned the skull after photographing it, near to the place but not in the exact location as I was very leary of provoking the creature(s) any further.)
Here in Texas I have seen the animal skeletons, some fresh but stripped clean, missing the legs and head. These were deer, wild boar and feral hogs. I also found a large pile of remains of aquatic creatures, fish: carp, alligator gar, catfish, turtles, large clamshells and crawfish. Some of the gar and catfish were large, up to 4 foot and nothing smaller than a bear or bigfoot could have carried them uphill for about a mile from the lake. In the case of the aquatic remains, I think it may just have been a favorite spot (a grassy knoll) to relax and eat.
I have some hair or fur- a fair amount of it- that I found near one of the fresh, stripped deer carcases and some distinct bigfoot footprints.. I think it is either bigfoot hair or something that it killed. I had it analysed by two experts with no definitive identification. One of the experts specializes in identifying hair for archaeologists and anthropologists and is reported to know mammal hair from the present back through the ice ages. She could not match it with any species. Right now I have a person who is interested in running a DNA analysis on it. I haven't decided what to do yet, as they have not identified the lab or their affilations. If things work out I will let you know who they are. I have had some of the same problems getting people to look at my material, most of them do not want the controversy. It would be great if we could do some "blind" testing, where the nature of the sample was completely unknown.
The hair is all one color from base to tip, either white, black, or brownish. There are finer hairs almost like an undercoat, which some say is not a characteristic of the higher primates, although in my research I have found exceptions, like the Snow Monkeys (macaques) of Japan, that have seasonal hair growth. I wouldn't say that I am certain this is bigfoot hair, just that it should be investigated further and compared to other samples. It is peculiar and doesn't look like any forest animal I know.
By the way, I want to compliment you on your research efforts and the way you conduct it with respect for the creatures and their well-being.
Thanks,
David